Comparison
Bitcoin and Ethereum
Each score uses its own weight profile: monetary and network protocol.
Bitcoin
BTC
LegendaryEthereum
ETH
LegendaryWhat changed. No score change. Bitcoin Core 31.1 maintenance in July 2026 and October 2026 32.0 release candidates confirm steady protocol stewardship.
Revenue: not applicable, removed from the mean.
- Analysed
- 15 Oct 2026
- Engine
- v5.2.0
- Computed
- 2026-10-15 05:16 UTC
- Inputs hash
- 377c04740253
What changed. No score change. Post-Pectra and Fusaka rollup scaling, multi-client execution, and DeFi settlement leadership keep all six pillars stable.
- Analysed
- 15 Oct 2026
- Engine
- v5.2.0
- Computed
- 2026-10-15 05:18 UTC
- Inputs hash
- a119ca9c2405
Fundamentals, not price. The monetary profile gives revenue no weight, so Bitcoin's revenue is not applicable.
Beyond the score
| Output | Bitcoin | Ethereum |
|---|---|---|
| Risk score | 2 of 10 | 3 of 10 |
| Chance of at least the price at analysis 12 months later | 86%above $83,280 | 90%above $2,504 |
| Cycle-peak scenario, median (about 39 months) | $159,100 | $4,886 |
| High (P90) over the price at analysis | 3.3× | 3.4× |
| Engine signal, not investment advice | Strong buy | Strong buy |
Scenario, not a forecast. Low, median and high are the 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles of the engine's estimate of the next Bitcoin cycle peak, carried to Ethereum through its co-movement with Bitcoin.
pBase comes from a separate lognormal model; its calibration is provisional.

