Skip to content
Sign inAccount
Menu
Sign inAccount
Set an alertAdd to watchlist: QuantixAI
QuantixAIQAICommon
24/100STRICT
Common
#908market cap23 Aug 2026

QuantixAI

QAI
AI, technical infrastructure weightsMarket-cap rank 908, CoinGecko 23 Oct 2026
Fundamentals, not price
PillarRatingPosition on the 0 to 100 scaleWeightAdds
Sustainability25×0.184.50
Transparency20×0.142.80
RevenueN/ARemoved from the mean×0.14–
Innovation25×0.266.50
Community25×0.143.50
Tokenomics25×0.143.50
Weighted sum 20.80 over applied weight 0.8624.19Rounds to the published score24
Analysed
23 Aug 2026
Engine
v5.2.0
Computed
2026-08-23 11:14 UTC
Inputs hash
4e80e0177b32

Pro opens QuantixAI in full. Change, scenario, signal, risk factors, catalysts.

See plans

Research, not financial advice. Read the terms.

Pillar evidence

Input set 23 Aug 2026. 2 sources, 8 citations.
Each arc is one pillar rating, drawn to scale from 0 to 100.A dashed arc is a pillar that does not apply. It is removed from the mean.
Sustainability25

Can this project keep operating and funding itself for years?

The verified ERC-20 contract and exchange tracking show that QAI still exists, but no sourced runway, treasury, audited operating product, or recurring business activity was found in this refresh.12

Transparency20

Can outsiders see and check what the team and the protocol do?

The token contract and supply are public, but the reviewed sources do not provide adequate team accountability, treasury reporting, governance records, strategy audits, or an unlock schedule for non-circulating supply.12

RevenueN/A

Does the protocol earn real fees or income from use?

Not applicable. Weight 0.14 in the technical infrastructure profile, so it neither lifts nor lowers the score.

Innovation25

Is the technology being built and shipped, and does it matter?

The verified contract is a conventional fixed-supply ERC-20 and does not implement or verify AI trading. No public source-code repository or independently tested model methodology was found for the claimed product.1

Community25

Who uses, builds and holds it, and how durable is that base?

CoinGecko tracks QAI on centralized exchanges including MEXC and BingX, but the available evidence does not establish durable product users, active developers, governance participation, or a measurable ecosystem.2

Tokenomics25

Do supply, issuance and unlocks protect holders from dilution?

QAI has a fixed 10 million maximum supply, but CoinGecko reports only 803,852 circulating, about 8%. The resulting 92% non-circulating overhang merits the maximum methodology dilution penalty without a sourced unlock schedule.21

Sources
  1. 1etherscan.io/token/0xcb21311d3b91b5324f6c11b4f5a656fcacbff122Cited for Sustainability, Transparency, Innovation, Tokenomics
  2. 2coingecko.com/en/coins/quantixaiCited for Sustainability, Transparency, Community, Tokenomics

About QuantixAI

Analysis of 23 Aug 2026

QuantixAI (QAI) is an Ethereum ERC-20 token associated with an AI trading project. CoinGecko identifies the verified contract as 0xcb21311d3b91b5324f6c11b4f5a656fcacbff122 and reports a 10 million total and maximum supply.

Full overviewShow less

Only 803,852 tokens, about 8% of that maximum, were classified as circulating as of August 2026. The contract establishes the token and its fixed issuance, but it does not verify trading strategies, customer assets, returns, or an operating AI service.

No primary source establishes audited product performance or protocol revenue.

Investment thesis

QAI offers exposure to an AI trading label, but the investable case is not supported by enough operating evidence. A fixed 10 million supply limits new minting, while the low circulating ratio creates a much larger and more immediate concern: roughly 92% of supply is outside the reported float.

Full thesisShow less

Without a public unlock schedule and wallet-control disclosures, holders cannot estimate when that supply may enter the market. The absence of independently verified strategy results, revenue data, governance documents, and a public development record makes valuation depend mainly on market demand for the token.

This evidence supports an AVOID posture until the project publishes verifiable product and supply disclosures.

Strengths
  • A verified Ethereum ERC-20 contract with a fixed 10 million total and maximum supply
  • Tracked centralized-exchange availability, including MEXC and BingX according to CoinGecko
  • Simple token code that is easier to inspect than a complex trading or custody contract
Risks
  • Only about 8% of maximum supply is reported as circulating, creating extreme dilution and concentration risk
  • No independent report verifies the performance of any AI or quantitative trading strategy
  • The ERC-20 contract does not establish that the advertised trading product works or generates revenue
  • No sourced unlock schedule explains when or how the non-circulating supply can enter the market
  • Limited team, governance, treasury, and development disclosure prevents a reliable operating assessment
Competitive position

QuantixAI competes for attention with crypto projects that publish model methodology, open-source code, fund performance, or on-chain product usage. QAI currently lacks comparable evidence.

Full positionShow less

Its verified contract proves token issuance, not an AI moat. The clearest differentiator would be independently audited strategy results and a public product record, but neither was available in the evidence reviewed on August 23, 2026.

Until those disclosures appear, larger and more transparent AI and trading projects have a stronger fundamental case.

Conclusion

QuantixAI is a high-risk token with a verified fixed supply but little verified operating evidence. The main measurable fact is unfavorable for holders: about 92% of the 10 million maximum supply is outside CoinGecko's reported circulating amount.

Full conclusionShow less

The project needs an unlock schedule, wallet disclosures, independent performance reporting, and verifiable revenue or usage before its AI trading case can be assessed. Until then, the appropriate stance is AVOID.

Add to watchlist